Consider a relational table r with sufficient number of records, having attributes A₁, A₂,....., A_n and let 1 $$ \le $$ p $$ \le $$ n. Two queries Q1 and Q2 are given below.

$$Q1: \pi_{A_1, \dots ,A_p} \left(\sigma_{A_p=c}\left(r\right)\right)$$ where is a constant

$$Q2: \pi_{A_1, \dots ,A_p} \left(\sigma_{c_1 \leq A_p \leq c_2}\left(r\right)\right)$$ where c₁ and c₂ are constants

The database can be configured to do ordered indexing on A_p or hashing on A_p. Which of the following statements is TRUE?

The following functional dependencies hold for relations R(A, B, C) and S(B, D, E): $$$\eqalign{ & B \to A \cr & A \to C \cr} $$$

The relation R contains 200 tuples and the relation S contains 100 tuples. What is the maximum number of tuples possible in the natural join R $$\Join$$ S?

Let R and S be two relations with the following schema

R (P, Q, R1, R2, R3)

S (P, Q, S1, S2)

Where {P, Q} is the key for both schemas. Which of the following queries are equivalent?
I. $$\Pi_P \left(R \bowtie S\right)$$
II. $$\Pi_P \left(R\right) \bowtie \Pi_P\left(S\right)$$
III. $$\Pi_P \left(\Pi_{P, Q} \left(R\right) \cap \Pi_{P,Q} \left(S\right) \right)$$
IV. $$\Pi_P \left(\Pi_{P, Q} \left(R\right) - \left(\Pi_{P,Q} \left(R\right) - \Pi_{P,Q} \left(S\right)\right)\right)$$

Consider the following relation schemas :

b-Schema = (b-name, b-city, assets)
a-Schema = (a-num, b-name, bal)
d-Schema = (c-name, a-number)

Let branch, account and depositor be respectively instances of the above schemas. Assume that account and depositor relations are much bigger than the branch relation.

Consider the following query:
П_c-name (σ_{b-city = “Agra” ⋀ bal < 0} (branch $$ \Join $$ (account $$ \Join $$ depositor))

Which one of the following queries is the most efficient version of the above query ?