Let $$L$$ be a language and $$\overline L $$ be its complement. Which one of the following is NOT a viable possibility?

If $$L$$ and $$\overline L $$ are recursively enumerable then $$L$$ is

For $$s \in {\left( {0 + 1} \right)^ * },$$ let $$d(s)$$ denote the decimal value of $$s(e. g.d(101)=5)$$
Let $$L = \left\{ {s \in {{\left( {0 + 1} \right)}^ * }\left| {\,d\left( s \right)\,} \right.} \right.$$ mod $$5=2$$ and $$d(s)$$ mod $$\left. {7 \ne 4} \right\}$$

Which of the following statement is true?

Let $${L_1}$$ be a regular language, $${L_2}$$ be a deterministic context-free language and $${L_3}$$ a recursively enumerable, but not recursive, language. Which one of the following statement is false?