Normally user programs are prevented from handling $${\rm I}/O$$ directly by $${\rm I}/O$$ instructions in the for $$CPU$$ having explicit $${\rm I}/O$$ instructions, such $${\rm I}/O$$ protection is ensured by having the $${\rm I}/O$$ instructions privilege in $$CPU$$ with memory mapped $${\rm I}/O$$ there is no explicit $${\rm I}/O$$ instruction. Which one of the following is true for a $$CPU$$ with memory mapped $${\rm I}/O$$?

Consider the following code fragment:

if (fork() == 0)
{
   a = a + 5;
   printf("%d, %d \n", a, &a);
}
else
{
   a = a - 5;
   printf ("%d, %d \n", a, &a);
}

Let $$u,v$$ be the values printed by the parent process, and $$x,y$$ be the values printed by the child process. Which one of the following is TRUE?

What does the following C statement declare?

int (*f)(int *);

Consider the following C program:

double foo(double); /* Line 1 */
int main () {
  double da, db;
  //input da
  db = foo(da);
}
double foo(double a){
  return a;
}

The above code compiled without any error or warning. If Line 1 is deleted, the above code will show: