Table: student
Roll | Name | Hostel | Marks |
---|---|---|---|
1798 | Manoj Rathod | 7 | 95 |
2154 | Soumic Banerjee | 5 | 68 |
2369 | Gumma Reddy | 7 | 86 |
2581 | Pradeep Pendse | 6 | 92 |
2643 | Suhas Kulkarni | 5 | 78 |
2711 | Nitin Kadam | 8 | 72 |
2872 | Kiran Vora | 5 | 92 |
2926 | Manoj Kunkalikar |
5 | 94 |
2959 | Hemant Karkhanis |
7 | 88 |
3125 | Rajesh Doshi | 5 | 82 |
Table: hobby
Roll | Hobbyname |
---|---|
1798 | chess |
1798 | music |
2154 | music |
2369 | swimming |
2581 | cricket |
2643 | chess |
2643 | hockey |
2711 | volleyball |
2872 | football |
2926 | cricket |
2959 | photography |
3125 | music |
3125 | chess |
The following SQL query is executed on the above tables:
Select hostel
From student natural join hobby
Where marks > = 75 and roll between 2000 and 3000;
Relations S and H with the same schema as those of these two tables respectively contain the same information as tuples. A new relation S’ is obtained by the following relational algebra operation:
$$\eqalign{ & S' = \prod\nolimits_{hostel} {(({\sigma _{S.roll = H.roll}}} \cr & ({\sigma _{marks > 75\,\,\,and\,\,roll > 2000\,\,and\,\,roll < 3000}}(S))X(H)) \cr} $$The difference between the number of rows output by the SQL statement and the number of tuples in S’ is
Let r be a relation instance with schema R = (A, B, C, D).
We define $${r_1} = {\pi _{A,B,C}}\left( r \right)$$ and $${r_1} = {\pi _{A,D}}\left( r \right)$$. Let $$s = {r_1}*{r_2}$$ where * denotes natural join. Given that the decomposition of r into r1 and r2 is lossy, which one of the following is TRUE?Select title
From book as B
Where (select count(*)
From book as T
Where T.price > B.price) < 5;
A company maintains records of sales made by its salespersons and pays them commission based on each individual’s total sales made in a year. This data is maintained in a table with following schema:
salesinfo = (salespersonid, totalsales, commission)In a certain year, due to better business results, the company decides to further reward its salespersons by enhancing the commission paid to them as per the following formula:
If commission < = 50000, enhance it by 2%
If 50000 < commission < = 100000, enhance it by 4%
If commission > 100000, enhance it by 6%
The IT staff has written three different SQL scripts to calculate enhancement for each slab, each of these scripts is to run as a separate transaction as follows:
T1: Update salesinfo
Set commission = commission * 1.02
Where commission < = 50000;
T2: Update salesinfo
Set commission = commission * 1.04
Where commission > 50000 and commission is < = 100000;
T3: Update salesinfo
Set commission = commission * 1.06
Where commission > 100000;
Which of the following options of running these transactions will update the commission of all salespersons correctly?