In a bottom-up evaluation of a syntax directed definition, inherited attributes can

Which of the following suffices to convert an arbitrary CFG to an LL(1) grammar?

Consider the grammar shown below

$$\eqalign{ & S \to iEtSS'\,|\,\,a \cr & S' \to eS\,|\,\,\varepsilon \cr & E \to b \cr} $$

In the predictive parse table, $$M$$, of this grammar, the entries $$M\left[ {S',e} \right]$$ and $$M\left[ {S',\phi } \right]$$ respectively are

Consider the translation scheme shown below

$$\eqalign{ & S \to TR \cr & R \to + T\left\{ {pr{\mathop{\rm int}} (' + ');} \right\}\,R\,|\,\varepsilon \cr & T \to num\,\left\{ {pr{\mathop{\rm int}} (num.val);} \right\} \cr} $$

Here num is a token that represents an integer and num.val represents the corresponding integer value. For an input string '9 + 5 + 2', this translation scheme will print