Suppose we want to synchronize two concurrent processes P and Q using binary semaphores S and T. The code for the processes P and Q is shown below.

Process P:

while(1){
  W:
  Print '0';
  Print '0';
  X:
}

Process Q:

while(1){
  Y:
  Print '1';
  Print '1';
  Z:
}

Synchronization statements can be inserted only at points W, X, Y, and Z.

Which of the following will ensure that the output string never contains a substring of the form 01ⁿ0 or 10ⁿ1 where n is odd?

In a system with $$32$$ bit virtual addresses and $$1$$ $$KB$$ page size, use of one-level page tables for virtual to physical address translation is not practical because of

Which of the following is NOT an advantage of using shared, dynamically linked libraries as opposed to using statically linked libraries?

A processor uses $$2$$-level page tables for virtual to physical address translation. Page tables for both levels are stored in the main memory. Virtual and physical addresses are both $$32$$ bits wide. The memory is byte addressable. For virtual to physical address translation, the $$10$$ most significant bits of the virtual address are used as index into the first level page table while the next $$10$$ bits are used as index into the second level page table. The $$12$$ least significant bits of the virtual address are used as offset within thepage. Assume that the page table entries in both levels of page tables are $$4$$ bytes wide. Further, the processor has a translation look-aside buffer (TLB), with a hit rate of $$96$$%. The TLB caches recently used virtual page numbers and the corresponding physical page numbers. The processor also has a physically addressed cache with a hit rate of $$90$$%. Main memory access time is $$10$$ ns, cache access time is $$1$$ ns, and TLB access time is also $$1$$ ns.

Assuming that no page faults occur, the average time taken to access a virtual address is approximately (to the nearest $$0.5$$ ns)