Let $${L_1}$$ recursive language. Let $${L_2}$$ and $${L_3}$$ be languages that are recursively enumerable but not recursive. Which of the following statement is not necessarily true?

Let $$L = \left\{ {w \in {{\left( {0 + 1} \right)}^ * }\left| {\,w} \right.} \right.$$ has even number of $$\,\left. {1's} \right\},$$ i.e $$L$$ is the set of all bit strings with even number of $$1's.$$ which one of rhe regular expression below represents $$L.$$

Let $$w$$ be any string of length $$n$$ in $${\left\{ {0,1} \right\}^ * }$$. Let $$L$$ be the set of all substrings of $$w.$$ What is the minimum number of states in a non-deterministic finite automation that accepts $$L$$?

Consider the languages $$$\eqalign{ & {L_1} = \left\{ {{0^i}{1^j}\,\left| {i \ne j} \right.} \right\},\,{L_2} = \left\{ {{0^i}{1^j}\,\left| {i = j} \right.} \right\}, \cr & {L_3} = \left\{ {{0^i}{1^j}\,\left| {i = 2j + 1} \right.} \right\}, \cr & {L_4} = \left\{ {{0^i}{1^j}\,\left| {i \ne 2j} \right.} \right\}, \cr} $$$