Consider the NPDA $$\left\langle {Q = \left\{ {{q_0},{q_1},{q_2}} \right\}} \right.,$$ $$\Sigma = \left \{ 0, 1 \right \},$$ $$\Gamma = \left \{ 0, 1, \perp \right \},$$ $$\delta, q_{0}, \perp,$$ $$\left. {F = \left\{ {{q_2}} \right\}} \right\rangle $$ , where (as per usual convention) $$Q$$ is the set of states, $$\Sigma$$ is the input alphabet, $$\Gamma$$ is the stack alphabet, $$\delta $$ is the state transition function q₀ is the initial state, $$\perp$$ is the initial stack symbol, and F is the set of accepting states. The state transition is as follows:

Which one of the following sequences must follow the string 101100 so that the overall string is accepted by the automaton?

For any two languages L₁ and L₂ such that L₁ is context-free and L₂ is recursively enumerable but not recursive, which of the following is/are necessarily true?

I. $${\overline L _1}$$ (complement of L₁) is recursive
II. $${\overline L _2}$$ (complement of L₂) is recursive
III. $${\overline L _1}$$ is context-free
IV. $${\overline L _1} \cup {L_2}$$ is recursively enumerable

Consider the DFAs M and N given above. The number of states in a minimal DFA that accepts the language L(M) ∩ L(N) is___________.

Which of the following statements is/are FALSE?

I. XML overcomes the limitations in HTML to support a structured way of organizing content.

II. XML specification is not case sensitive while HTML specification is case sensitive.

III. XML supports user defined tags while HTML uses pre-defined tags.

IV. XML tags need not be closed while HTML tags must be closed.