Consider the following relational schema.

Students(rollno: integer, sname: string)

Courses(courseno: integer, cname: string)

Registration(rollno: integer, courseno: integer, percent: real)

Which of the following queries are equivalent to this query in English?

"Find the distinct names of all students who score more than 90% in the course numbered 107"

(I) SELECT DISTINCT S.sname 
FROM Students as S, Registration as R 
WHERE R.rollno=S.rollno AND 
R.courseno=107 AND R.percent >90

(II) ∏_sname(σ_courseno = 107 ∧ percent > 90 (Registration ⋈ Students))

(III) { T | ∃S ∈ Students, ∃R ∈ Registration ( S.rollno=R.rollno ∧ R.courseno=107 ∧ R.percent > 90 ∧ T.sname=S.sname)}

(iv) { < S_N >| ∃S_R∃R_P ( < S_R, S_N > ∈ Students ∧ ∈ Registration ∧ R_P > 90)}

An index is clustered, if

Relation $$R$$ has eight attribution $$ABCDEFGH.$$ Fields of $$R$$ contain only atomic values.
$$F = \left\{ {CH \to G,\,\,A \to BC,\,B \to CFH,\,\,E \to A,\,\,F \to EG} \right\}$$ set of functional dependencies $$(FDs)$$ so that $${F^ + }$$ is exactly the set of $$FDs$$ that hold for $$R.$$

How many candidate keys does the relation $$R$$ have?

Relation $$R$$ has eight attribution $$ABCDEFGH.$$ Fields of $$R$$ contain only atomic values.
$$F = \left\{ {CH \to G,\,\,A \to BC,\,B \to CFH,\,\,E \to A,\,\,F \to EG} \right\}$$ set of functional dependencies $$(FDs)$$ so that $${F^ + }$$ is exactly the set of $$FDs$$ that hold for $$R.$$

The relation $$R$$ is