Consider the following statements:
Statement I: In India, State Governments have no power for making rules for grant of concessions in respect of extraction of minor minerals even though such minerals are located in their territories.
Statement II: In India, the Central Government has the power to notify minor minerals under the relevant law.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements:
I. An Ordinance can amend any Central Act.
II. An Ordinance can abridge a Fundamental Right.
III. An Ordinance can come into effect from a back date.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
$$ \text { Consider the following pairs: } $$
| State | Description | |
|---|---|---|
| I. | Arunachal Pradesh | The capital is named after a fort, and the State has two National Parks |
| II. | Nagaland | The State came into existence on the basis of a Constitutional Amendment Act |
| III. | Tripura | Initially a Part 'C' State, it became a centrally administered territory with the reorganisation of States in 1956 and later attained the status of a fullfledged State |
With reference to India, consider the following:
I. The Inter-State Council
II. The National Security Council
III. Zonal Councils
How many of the above were established as per the provisions of the Constitution of India?
UPSC Civil Service Papers
All year-wise previous year question papers